Audio and Video from “An Evening of Eschatology”
Posted by Jim Hamilton on October 6, 2009
It was my privilege and honor to participate in “An Evening of Eschatology” at Bethlehem Baptist Church, hosted by the Bethlehem College and Seminary, with John Piper, Sam Storms, and Doug Wilson.
The Audio and Video of the event are available, with an introduction from John Piper, here.
May the Lord be glorified and his word understood.
michael said
I just watched it and thought you all did a good job. You didn’t convince me to your position, but well done.
By the way, you kept saying that Sam’s position flattened out everything. I think that his view and the recapitulation of the visions in Revelation actually give it more depth, contours, and demension instead of “flattening it all out” as you say for it provides for us different camera angles of the same events.
William said
It may seem “Deeper” and that’s the trap of Reformed Eschatology, but it isn’t faithful to the text.
Jim,
The question about unbelievers entering the Millennial kingdom was a softball!! I couldn’t believe you bunted!
Jesus said in Matt 24 that those who endure to the end will be saved (speaking of flesh that wouldn’t be saved if the time was not shortened for the elect’s sake) and believers who did not take the mark of the beast and survive the tribulation end up entering the kingdom and repopulating it with unregenerate children.
There ya go…
michael said
William,
Jim is not dispensational as you appear to be. I doubt he holds to your understanding of the 70 weeks and the dispensational notion of a “seven-year tribulation period”
Dan Phillips said
…that’s the trap of Reformed Eschatology, but it isn’t faithful to the text
Bingo.
williamdudding1977 said
Amazing how the guys you were debating with who are so smart, are so clueless. They have no framework for to guide their interpretation of eschatology. I mean, Sam Storms was taking a few statements by Paul and then distorting every other scripture to make it fit.
It’s easy, Daniel sets the framework, and the 70th week is fleshed out in the Olivet Discourse, and Revelation fleshes out what Jesus explained in the Olivet Discourse. We have to interpret scripture from beginning to end progressively. I didn’t see that at all with Doug and Sam. They have no clear reference points to guide them.
TLG said
Please read Storm’s ‘Problems with Premil.’ paper. It is not just one text. Blessings.
Kyle said
I have to say, it gave me something of a giddy joy to watch you battle (with love) tooth & nail with guys like Storms and Wilson. Watching the video also reminded me how much I miss being under your tutelage. The students at Southern are blessed.
Job well done.
Shane said
Dr. Hamilton,
You’re obviously a very intelligent man…but so are Dr. Storms and Pastor Wilson. I was appalled at your demeanor towards the end of the debate. Constantly interrupting the other two men by shouting Bible verses at them isn’t beneificial. Unfortunately you came across like a petulant, know-it-all child debating a couple of mature grown men. I don’t know you, but I assume you’re a great man of God. I can’t imagine Southern Seminary having anyone who wasn’t. So I’ll give the benefit of the doubt and assume you got caught up in winning the argument. But I hope if you have such an opportunity again, you’ll show a little more courtesy towards your brothers in Christ.
Jim Hamilton said
Shane,
Thanks for your note. I apologize for offending you, and I hope you’ll forgive me. I know that I stumble in many ways, and I am so thankful for the death of Christ on the cross. I want to repent of all the sin in my life, so thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Under eternal mercy,
JMH
Shane said
Dr. Hamilton,
No apology towards me is necessary, but you are very gracious to offer one. Your humility is inspiring. God Bless you.
Dan Phillips said
Dr. Hamilton…I was appalled at your demeanor
Personally, I think you misspelled “Storms” and “hubris.”
Honestly — “If my interpretation of Revelation 20 is wrong, and John means something other than what I think he means, then the Bible is in error!”
Mercy.
Shane said
Dan,
You’re needlessly changing the subject. I agree with you anyway. I think Dr. Storms exaggerated more than he needed to. Dr. Hamilton’s reply to me was very gracious (see above).
Dan Phillips said
Yes, Shane. Dr. Hamilton was very gracious.
And you were off-target.